Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. esp. anestesiol. reanim ; 66(10): 506-520, dic. 2019. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-192104

RESUMO

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: Los objetivos de la Sección de Cuidados Intensivos de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor (SCI-SEDAR) con el presente trabajo son: establecer nuevas recomendaciones adaptando los estándares publicados por el Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social, y alineadas con las principales guías internacionales, y desarrollar una herramienta de mejora de la calidad y la eficiencia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODO: A lo largo de 2018, 3 miembros de la SCI-SEDAR definieron la metodología, desarrollaron las recomendaciones y seleccionaron al panel de expertos. Debido a la limitada evidencia de buena parte de las recomendaciones y a la importante variabilidad estructural de las unidades de cuidados intensivos de anestesia actuales, se optó por un abordaje Delphi modificado para determinar el grado de consenso. RESULTADOS: Un total de 24 expertos de 21 instituciones constituyeron el grupo de expertos del presente trabajo. Se establecieron 175 recomendaciones sobre 8 apartados, incluyendo 129 con consenso fuerte y 46 con consenso débil. CONCLUSIONES: La SCI-SEDAR estableció las recomendaciones estructurales de las unidades de cuidados intensivos de anestesia que deberán guiar la renovación o la creación de nuevas unidades


BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In this article, the Intensive Care Section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology (SCI-SEDAR) establishes new recommendations based on the standards published by the Ministry of Health, Consumer Affairs and Social Welfare and aligned with the principle international guidelines, and develops a tool to improve quality and efficiency. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Over a 12-month period (2018), 3 members of the SCI-SEDAR defined the methodology, developed the recommendations and selected the panel of experts. Due to the limited evidence available for many of the recommendations and the significant structural differences between existing anesthesia intensive care units, we chose a modified Delphi approach to determine the degree of consensus. RESULTS: The panel consisted of 24 experts from 21 institutions. The group put forward 175 recommendations on 8 sections, including 129 with strong consensus and 46 with weak consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The SCI-SEDAR has established a series of structural recommendations that should be used when renovating or creating new anesthesia intensive care units


Assuntos
Humanos , Anestesiologia/normas , Consenso , Arquitetura de Instituições de Saúde/normas , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Anestesia , Anestesiologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade Arquitetônica/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade Arquitetônica/normas , Técnica Delfos , Arquitetura de Instituições de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Número de Leitos em Hospital/normas , Trabalho Doméstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Limpeza/normas , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Decoração de Interiores e Mobiliário/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Lavanderia/normas , Iluminação/normas , Quartos de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência , Quartos de Pacientes/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sociedades Médicas , Espanha
2.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) ; 66(10): 506-520, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31470981

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In this article, the Intensive Care Section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology (SCI-SEDAR) establishes new recommendations based on the standards published by the Ministry of Health, Consumer Affairs and Social Welfare and aligned with the principle international guidelines, and develops a tool to improve quality and efficiency. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Over a 12-month period (2018), 3 members of the SCI-SEDAR defined the methodology, developed the recommendations and selected the panel of experts. Due to the limited evidence available for many of the recommendations and the significant structural differences between existing anesthesia intensive care units, we chose a modified Delphi approach to determine the degree of consensus. RESULTS: The panel consisted of 24 experts from 21 institutions. The group put forward 175 recommendations on 8 sections, including 129 with strong consensus and 46 with weak consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The SCI-SEDAR has established a series of structural recommendations that should be used when renovating or creating new anesthesia intensive care units.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia/normas , Consenso , Arquitetura de Instituições de Saúde/normas , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Anestesia , Anestesiologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade Arquitetônica/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade Arquitetônica/normas , Técnica Delfos , Arquitetura de Instituições de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Número de Leitos em Hospital/normas , Trabalho Doméstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Limpeza/normas , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Decoração de Interiores e Mobiliário/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Lavanderia/normas , Iluminação/normas , Quartos de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência , Quartos de Pacientes/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sociedades Médicas , Espanha
5.
Health Estate ; 61(6): 31-2, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17724950

RESUMO

Hospital lighting must conform to a wide range of international standards. The purchaser of lights, ranging from bedside lamps to operating theatre units, is responsible for ensuring that a hospital's luminaires comply with relevant legislation. James Verrinder reports.


Assuntos
Equipamentos e Provisões Hospitalares/normas , Unidades Hospitalares/normas , Iluminação/normas , Quartos de Pacientes/normas , Europa (Continente) , Regulamentação Governamental , Unidades Hospitalares/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Quartos de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência
6.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 68(3): 152-4, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17419470

RESUMO

From April 2007 there will be two acts of parliament that govern the legal detention of patients in hospitahl: the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. This article addresses common questions posed to liaison psychiatrists by hospital doctors: how to legally detain patients on general wards and how these Acts are applied.


Assuntos
Internação Compulsória de Doente Mental/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Gerais/legislação & jurisprudência , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Pessoas Mentalmente Doentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Quartos de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Competência Mental/legislação & jurisprudência , Restrição Física/legislação & jurisprudência
8.
Br J Nurs ; 9(9): 566-9, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11904892

RESUMO

This article, the second in a series of three considering issues of autonomy, privacy and informed consent in nurse/patient interactions, focuses on the wider conceptions of patient privacy and confidentiality. Given that patients in institutional care are likely to suffer intrusions into their privacy which would be considered unusual in normal social interaction, it is interesting to note the dearth of literature in this area. Some definitions of privacy are considered in an attempt to begin to raise readers' awareness of the complexity of this notion. It can be argued that privacy is a pertinent notion to consider, both in order to gain a greater understanding of what is meant by the term and in terms of the implications of this understanding for clinical practice.


Assuntos
Confidencialidade , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Relações Enfermeiro-Paciente , Cuidados de Enfermagem/psicologia , Cuidados de Enfermagem/normas , Defesa do Paciente , Autonomia Pessoal , Privacidade , Confidencialidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Masculino , Avaliação em Enfermagem/legislação & jurisprudência , Avaliação em Enfermagem/métodos , Avaliação em Enfermagem/normas , Defesa do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Quartos de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência , Quartos de Pacientes/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Privacidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Reino Unido
10.
Med Lav ; 90(2): 141-51, 1999.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10371811

RESUMO

The Law (Presidential Decree) of 14/1/97 requested the regions of Italy to define and develop procedures for the accreditation of their health facilities. Since accreditation promotes the quality of the system, the support of ergonomics can be fundamental. Ergonomics, whose quality objective is harmony of the environment-man-object relationship, is in a position to make a major contribution to the complete application of the procedures for quality certification (ISO regulation 9000) and of the regulations regarding mandatory safety regulations (Law 626/94). The present paper analyzes the tasks of health workers vis-a-vis patients, highlighting the improvement or worsening effect of environmental features which not only have a direct effect on movements and general activity but also have an indirect effect on psychological and behavioural conditions. The first requirement that should be taken into consideration in environments that are also used by patients is that everything that can facilitate or make their walking and access to facilities self-sufficient will certainly make the healthcare workers' tasks easier, which can then be limited to lifting required for treatment and washing. The ward, especially, is an area that is extremely important from the point of view of design because it is where the patient does practically everything and where the staff, too, are mainly engaged in hygiene/treatment tasks, involving both patients and their relatives. The bed must be able to be easily used by potentially disabled patients who have difficulty in walking and moving. The beds should therefore be equipped with or have close by handles and rails that assist the patient to lie down, get up and move from the bed; the bed should also have a manual or electrical device to adjust the height (from 40 to 70 cm) and have four wheels (that can each be blocked) to make it easier to move. The supporting legs should occupy as little space as possible and should not interfere with wheelchairs or other walking aids or with the movements of the staff. The head and foot-boards should have parts that can be used as grips. The space between both sides of the beds should be at least 90 cm and the space between headboard and wall 120 cm; bedside tables should be no deeper than 30 cm and be fitted with wheels. On the question of space distribution design, another important requirement is flexibility. Adequate flexibility of space distribution together with adaptable technological systems mean that the spaces and equipment of the ward can be easily adapted to the great variety of needs.


Assuntos
Ambiente Controlado , Remoção , Quartos de Pacientes , Ergonomia/legislação & jurisprudência , Ergonomia/normas , Humanos , Decoração de Interiores e Mobiliário/legislação & jurisprudência , Decoração de Interiores e Mobiliário/normas , Itália , Iluminação/legislação & jurisprudência , Iluminação/normas , Quartos de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência , Quartos de Pacientes/normas , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...